[This review of the supposedly classic 1950 Japanese film was rejected by IMDb earlier this month.]
This has been called one of the greatest films ever made. To me it is a load of old rubbish. I watched it with subtitles which I presume were accurate. An outlaw sees a Samurai walking through the forest leading his wife on horseback. Suddenly, this reprobate is filled with desire to rape the woman – desire indeed, but that was his word – and murder her husband. The woman is indeed raped and the husband ends up dead. The culprit is apprehended, tried and convicted. He admits his crimes. End of. Or so one would think. Instead, we are treated to a series of diatribes about epistomology. One thoroughly impressed critic said the way the film was lit conveyed messages about the veracity of the claims of the participants – which included the ghost of the murdered man. Seriously?
The reality is that we all view the real world from different perspectives. We may see only part of an incident – a trick used by leftists when confronting the police; we may be looking or listening from a different angle. We may be partially deaf or even colour blind, but there are limits. Catharine MacKinnon may not be able to distinguish consensual sex from a violent rape, but the rest of us can.
The message of this film can be summed up in those three immortal words of the Queen of England: recollections may vary.








