Execution Watchers And Imbeciles

One night in September 2007, Robert Sparks murdered his wife, stabbing her eighteen times. He then stabbed his two stepsons to death. He also had two stepdaughters; they were spared, but he raped them both.

Sparks was convicted of these unspeakable crimes. In Texas, that can mean only one thing. He was sentenced to death, and as usual, it took the Lone Star State a long time to carry out the execution. He was finally strapped to a gurney in September 2019. An eleven year gap between conviction and execution is far from exceptional, but even for the “obviously guilty”, there is an extensive appeal process in capital cases, the first appeal being mandatory.

Sparks was indeed obviously guilty. There was never any question that these crimes were committed by him and him alone. If ever there was a fitting subject for execution, it was him: three murders, shattering the lives of the two survivors. Bringing grief and distress to relatives, friends, neighbours, schoolmates of the victims... Why should even the most ardent abolitionist shed a tear or bat an eyelid at the execution of a monster like Robert Sparks?

Strangely, that is not how the clowns at Execution Watch see it. This august organisation was founded by a deluded individual with the unfortunate name of Ray Hill. Unlike his English namesake, Hill is no longer with us, he died last year. Ray Hill was a man who was proud to call some of the most odious human beings on this planet his friends. Ray may be gone, but the clown show continues, you see, what Execution Watch found so outrageous about the Robert Sparks case was not his crimes, but the fact that during his trial, a court bailiff was seen wearing a black tie embroidered with a white syringe.

Execution Watch considered this to be highly prejudicial. That’s right. They objected to a prejudicial tie pin more than to a triple murder with a double rape of underage girls thrown in. Unreal.

Although Sparks was black, his wife was too, so the race card wouldn’t fly. That doesn’t usually stop race hustlers, but even Al Sharpton wouldn’t touch this one with a bargepole. So what do Execution Watch and their ilk fall back on? Intellectual disability and the chimera of mental illness.

Sparks was said to have believed his family was trying to poison him. That claim appears to be true, but so what? According to one report, he had an IQ of only 75, which is low, but not as low for blacks as for whites. That being said, there are plenty of total retards out there who go through life without committing even one murder. Also, Sparks could drive a car. No one who can drive a car is so mentally challenged or intellectually disabled that he cannot be held accountable for his actions. And does it make sense to execute intelligent people but not retards?

Burn in Hell, bubba.

Harold Covington R.I.P.

I used to listen to his Radio Free Northwest podcast fairly regularly, but for the past year I’ve been following the Trump/Russia collusion hoax with such intensity that with work commitments, listening to music, and watching the odd documentary, I never got round to tuning in to it. Until yesterday, when I received a shock.

I say shock, the parlous state of Harold’s health was hardly a secret, all the same I hadn’t expected him to pass so soon, and I find it difficult to believe he could have died as long ago as July 18 – nearly a year – without my having read or heard something.

Passing over his various obituaries, it is clear Harold is remembered by his detractors as a notorious bigot, with more than a little justification, and even by some people on his own side as a pernicious influence. He became a non-person to his brother Ben. This article contains some interesting background information on Harold, though the reader will have to decide for himself how much of it is truth and how much spin. The idea that white supremacy is a “mental illness” is certainly quaint.

An avuncular looking Harold Armstead Covington (1953-2018)

Harold has of course been accused of being a state asset, primarily because of his outrageous rhetoric. He has been accused of forging documents, a claim that is not entirely baseless as I know from one e-mail exchange with him.

However Harold is remembered by others, I will always remember him as a true friend in my darkest hour, certainly my darkest hour in a long time when a filthy cabal tried to and nearly did destroy me over a triviality, basically an off-the-cuff remark. The lies they told and the spin they put on it still takes my breath away. All Harold knew was that a cyber-correspondent, a man he had never met, was in deep trouble, and he did what he could to broadcast my plight to the world; he also wrote to me several times and sent me a mailing I much appreciated. Later he sent me copies of his Northwest Novels, one of which I read intensely, and later still a copy of Give Me The Night, which I reviewed.

It is likely that as his brother points out Harold became anti-black due to childhood experiences, though the claim that he was a coward, that he was ever a coward, is too stupid to comment on. People who engage in his sort of extremism, including on the far left, often have more courage than common sense. Harold himself recognised this; while I have no doubt he was as horrified as the rest of us by the atrocities of 9/11, he expressed amazement, almost admiration for the way it was carried out, and that withstanding his later comments about the entire outrage being a false flag, a view shared by a lot of people across a wide political spectrum who should know better.

In spite of his so-called racism, Harold sympathised with the Arab cause and everyone who suffered under Zionism and other fascistic ideologies. And now I am going to say something that will probably make his friends laugh as much as his enemies. If Harold had lived in Nazi Germany, he would not have joined the SS, he would have ended up in a concentration camp. Had he lived in Amsterdam in 1944, he would have hidden the Frank family rather than betrayed them.

I say this because not only did Harold sympathise with the underdog, but like me, he was a born contrarian. Also like me he experienced the full force of wanton state power, and was equally contemptuous of the petty sadists who wield it. Although he was a student of history and had an encyclopaedic knowledge of it from the perspective of Western Man, he made the same mistake as so many black “radicals”. When they come up against it, they call it the white power structure; Harold called it ZOG. The reality is that whoever wields such power will crush anyone if they have the chance. Anyone, white, black or Jew, poor or rich, radical, progressive, or just plain ordinary. Anyone who doubts this should study the cases of Conrad Black, Dinesh D’Souza, or more historically, the black separatist Marcus Garvey and the atheist John William Gott.

Having said that, the people Harold hated most were the apparatchiks of the power structure, and he had no problem in calling them out. The truth is that Harold was at heart a Libertarian, one who believed passionately in The Fourteen Words. Recall that famous saying from the Middle East: “I and my brother against my cousin, I and my cousin against our neighbor, I and my neighbor against the world.”

There is no expression of hate here, ditto “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children”.

Harold would gladly have seen that phrase universalised, even for Jews, but he decided to concentrate on saving his own people. What is so bad about that? The answer is of course nothing, and it is only his political enemies who would have us believe so by their incessant demonisation of everything white. And it is a sad fact that so many of those political enemies have been Jews, as the better among the Jews readily acknowledge, including Michael Levin and Paul Gottfried.

I could write a lot more about Harold, I will add only that he had great taste in music, introducing me to both Axe and Loreena McKennitt, the latter of whom he once said convinced him there really was a God in Heaven by the angelic quality of her voice.

I am not ashamed to say that after learning yesterday of Harold’s death I was not dry eyed. He deserved a better fate if only to live for the Biblical three score and ten. To his detractors he was Weird Harold doubtless among many other appellations; to me he was Wicked Harold, after a poem I wrote about Sonia Gable, but wicked in the colloquial sense. Now he walks in Valhalla, unlike most of his enemies and not a few fellow travellers, who will be going to the other place.

R.IP. Harold

15 Stansted Morons

Earlier this year I attended a meeting at which the issue of these braindeads and morons was raised. They were being prosecuted under anti-terrorist legislation, we were told, and faced sentences of up to life in prison. We hear this kind of bullshit all the time. In England you can get seven years for shoplifting, but who does?

What did they do? They stormed an airport to prevent a plane taking off because...racism. Yawn.

A number of undesirables were being kicked out of the UK, forcibly, so-called asylum seekers, or asylum sneakers as I prefer to call them. The reality is that there are precious few genuine asylum seekers in the UK because under international law, asylum must be sought in the first safe country to which the applicant flees. Obviously there are honorable exceptions; Malala Yousafzai was brought here for medical treatment after being shot in the face. Ali Abbas lives here, though it remains to be seen why he should want to live in a country that did to him what we did.

Leaving those two aside, the overwhelming majority of asylum seekers are economic migrants, and many of them are criminals with a capital C. They all claim to have suffered political persecution, every single one. And the women, they all claim to have been sexually abused if not gang-raped, every single one.

The women are if anything far worse than the men, and pathetic with it. Amina Muse claimed to have seen her brothers murdered in Somalia, where she was also gang-raped. That was in 1998. She had in fact been domiciled in Sweden since 1995. In January 2011, she was given a four and a half year sentence at Harrow Crown Court for fraud.

Verna Joseph turned up in the UK from Saint Lucia in February 2005 with over 2 kilograms of pure cocaine in her luggage. She lied to those nice customs officers, then at trial came out with a cock and bull story about acting under extreme duress. She claimed to have been raped, and claimed after her release from prison to have been raped in the UK as well. How unfortunate is that? While she was here she gave birth to her ninth child, yes, her ninth, and was such a piss poor mother that the baby was taken away from her. Do we really want trash like this claiming asylum in Britain? Don’t we have enough trash of our own?

The 15 Stansted morons would if they had their way allow a million, ten million or a hundred million Verna Josephs into this country because it can only be racist to refuse them admittance. In the end, these braindeads walked away from their trial with zero gaol time. Zero. Had they pulled a similar stunt in China, or perish the thought, Israel, they might well have been shot, and would deserved to have been. There are certain things you don’t do at an airport, like never. You don’t joke about the semtex in your luggage, and you don’t storm the runway. Never. Ever. Period. Full stop.

In October 2018, a similar incident happened at Heathrow, only this time it was the passengers who halted the deportation. Somali native Yaqub Ahmed was being deported via Turkey, and the passengers, not wanting to see this poor man separated from his family, rose up and prevented it. Ahmed was one of four lowlifes who gang-raped a teenager in 2007. No one is illegal? Yeah, right.

9/11 Was Not Something Some People Did

The new intake of Democratic Representatives includes the photogenic but moronic Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the odious Rashida Tlaib, a Moslem woman sans hijab who thinks mother is half a word. They are of course extremely disappointing, but Ilhan Omar at least gave the appearance of a woman who was prepared to speak truth to power, even with the certainty of being branded an anti-Semite – see previous blog.

Alas, it is one thing to point out that Organised Jewry inject big money into politics, it is quite another to own your own shit, as the saying goes. Here she is making light of 9/11. And she is so wrong.

In the first place, CAIR was founded in 1994, the year after the first attack on the Twin Towers when a truck bomb detonated under the North Tower killed six people and injured over a thousand. That though was not the reason it was founded, rather the portrayal of Arabs by Hollywood and in particular the film True Lies had more than a little to do with it. *

In the second place, the terrorists who carried out these acts of kamikaze mass murder were not “some people”, they were Islamists, men whose perverted interpretation of Islam was both a catalyst and a necessary ingredient for their dreadful acts. If they had been Israeli soldiers murdering Palestinian kids, Omar would have called them Zionists, Zionist murderers or something of that nature, not “some people”.

And after 9/11, people stared at her...is that so surprising? Now here is something she will definitely not have thought of. Nearly three thousand people died due to 9/11, more when one considers the after effects: cancers, etc. One person died at Charlottesville, one. The man responsible was a so-called white supremacist, a man who was considered unsuitable for the US Army, not for any political reason, but because he wasn’t up to it.

On account of the death of this one protester, “white supremacists” and “Nazis” were demonised, and an attempt was made to impeach the President simply because he didn’t condemn this “attack” quickly enough, ie before all the facts were in. If Ilhan Omar sincerely believes Moslems are second class citizens in the United States, if she believes they are stereotyped, she really should look beyond her own goldfish bowl.

* True Lies was released July 15, 1994; CAIR was founded officially the previous month, but this blockbuster film had been heavily promoted.

Ilhan Omar — Speaking Truth To Jewish Power

The new intake of Democratic freshmen (of both sexes) has been largely disappointing. First and foremost is the moronic Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who has made so many absurd and insane pronouncements that she beggars belief. Then there is the so-called Moslem Rashida Tlaib who not only left her hijab at home but her sense of decency when she announced to a crowd including her own son that the Democrats would “impeach the motherfucker”. But on the other hand, there is Ilhan Omar, a genuine Moslem NAWALT.

Her comment about big money in politics – “It’s all about the benjamins, baby” (from a 1990s rap “song”) – caused a stir when she followed it up with the single word AIPAC, and we saw denunciations galore of what has been called an anti-Semitic trope.

Oh no, not again, someone is accusing the Joos of controlling the Government or even the world, and this time the filthy anti-Semite is a serving national politician. This is hypocrisy and stupidity combined in equal measure. When Donald Trump alluded to Mexican “rapists” crossing the Southern border illegally he didn’t mean all Mexican men were rapists; everybody knew that, however much the Democrats and others claimed he did. Similarly, no one with a nanogramme of common sense or an ounce of decency would claim Omar was alluding to all the Jews in America. Surprising, isn’t it just how many people have neither a nanogramme of common sense nor an ounce of decency?

Won’t it be fun if she goes off on the homosexual lobby, or even better, the Federal Reserve? Sharia-compliant banking for Uncle Sam, now that’s a thought!

Why The Police Can’t Stop Teen Knife Crime

According to yesterday’s Guardian, ten teenagers have now been stabbed to death in England this year: five in London, three in Birmingham, one in Manchester, one in Sunderland. Why can’t the police stop this?

This afternoon on my way home from a shopping trip, I passed a police car in Linden Grove, the road that runs parallel to Penge East Station. Sure enough, there was a small group of them hanging around the station exit waiting to catch fare dodgers. Last month when I got off the train on my way home after a short day in the Library, there was a mass of them along with ticket inspectors. They caught two young black kids who were travelling without tickets. Colin Flaherty will have been proud.

I have my own experience of these imbeciles, morons and outright tyrants who will waste thousands of hours of precious police time and seemingly endless sums of public money to destroy otherwise innocuous people. They failed in my case, but boy, have they got Nemesis coming with a capital N. Best not to mention their “policing” of Twitter.

In the meantime, if your son is stabbed to death by a gangsta or a psycho, don’t be too surprised if they don’t catch him. After all, they have more pressing, and safer suspects, to target.

Why They Hate Farrakhan, And How They Lie About Him

 

The article below appeared on the front page of the London Jewish Chronicle, August 3, 1984. Nearly thirty-five years later, the same powerful vested interests are making the same noises about Minister Farrakhan and smearing him in the same way. To take just one recent example, when Farrakhan was branded an anti-Semite for the N thousandth time, he retorted that he was not anti-Semite but anti-termite. Shock, horror, that wicked man branded “Jewish people” termites. No, he did not. Like Donald Trump, Farrakhan has never been shy about repaying his detractors in their own coin. He branded Jewish leaders termites, the likes of the ADL who supported two Gaza massacres and the Flotilla massacre. If these people are not termites, they aren’t much higher up the food chain.

Farrakhan has also been branded anti-white. As whites are constantly being told by other whites how racist they are, surely we can forgive him this. In fact, Farrakhan’s most stringent criticism has always been reserved for his fellow blacks; he has for example attacked what he called the glorification of the gun.

So why has Farrakhan become such a hate figure for the lib-tards, one of the very few black men it is possible to attack without being branded racist?

There are two reasons, one is that like the late great Muhammad Ali he is a black separatist. In short he believes bluebirds should fly with bluebirds; that may go down well with the likes of wicked Harold Covington, but its corollary – white survival – goes down very badly with the likes of the ADL, Tim Wise, and other self-styled anti-racists for whom white survival is akin to hate. Talk about projection.

The second reason, which is just as important, is that Farrakhan is a student of the financial conspiracy; he knows how and why the Federal Reserve was founded, and how usury robs everyone from the poor to the point one percent in order to enrich the banksters. Is this man our enemy? Is he Hell!